Emails sent at work are property of company, users have no expectation of privacy: Lawyer
|
Calgary, Alberta (115 employees of a museum) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1645
|
Toronto, Ontario (70 employees making tortillas) and the United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1000A
|
Richmond, British Columbia (115 employees of a meat distribution company) and the Service, Health and Allied Workers’ Union, Local 501, the Christian Labour Association of Canada
|
Ontario (120 outside employees) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1542
|
Montreal, Quebec (3,469 bus and subway operators and fare collectors of a transit system) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1983
|
Sussex, New Brunswick (11 employees making heating equipment and furnaces) and the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers, Local 49N
|
The grievor was not able to work due to an illness and was waiting for short-term disability benefits. After being assured he would be covered, the decision was reversed after a long delay. He used profanity to the insurance provider. The arbitrator found that the company's response of termination was disproportionate and he substituted a warning.
|
The grievor was caught watching a movie at work and was fired. The arbitrator found that the company's characterization of the event was excessive and substituted a lesser penalty.
|