‘Reasonable’ standard for video surveillanceThe employer had videotape surveillance of a worker it felt was abusing sick leave. The union objected to its introduction. The arbitrator decided the issue on the test of reasonableness, not relevance, but allowed the evidence nonetheless.By Mark Rogers07/04/2011|Canadian Labour Reporter|Last Updated: 07/01/2011 Fired for allegedly misrepresenting the nature of injuries that she claimed were preventing her from attending work, a hotel laundry worker grieved. At the outset of the hearing, the employer stated its intent to present video surveillance evidence documenting the off-hours activities of the grievor.The union objected. To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In Remember Me Forgot Password If you are a current Subscriber, please click here to set-up or update your login information.