Insubordination violates last chance agreementThe grievor left his post and asked an untrained colleague to cover for him. A significant amount of product was wasted when the equipment malfunctioned. The arbitrator found termination was justified.By Mark Rogers05/14/2012|Canadian Labour Reporter|Last Updated: 05/14/2012 A mill worker responsible for overseeing a critical operation was fired after leaving his station in violation of company policy.R.M. was fired from his job at a pipe mill in July 2010 following documented incidents of poor work performance, attendance problems and insubordination. He was reinstated two months later under the terms of a Last Chance Agreement (LCA).The LCA committed R.M. to make efforts to improve his performance and attitude and to follow all company rules, policies and procedures. To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In Remember Me Forgot Password If you are a current Subscriber, please click here to set-up or update your login information.